Let’s start with the basics. There are only two ways an agency can buy media for a client:
1. The Agent Model
This is the model most marketers assume they are getting.
The agency buys media on behalf of the client.
The media is bought in the client’s name.
The agency earns a transparent fee or commission.
The client sees the cost and can audit everything.
The agency acts as an adviser whose incentives are aligned with the advertiser.
This is the clean and transparent approach.
Then you have the second way that an agency can buy media for a client:
2. The Principal Model
This works very differently.
Here, the agency (or a related trading entity within the agency) buys media for itself first, often in bulk. It holds this media as inventory and then resells it to clients at a price it sets. The margin between what the agency originally paid and what the client pays is not disclosed.
In this model, the agency is no longer acting purely as an adviser.
It has become a seller.
This doesn’t make principal media illegal or unethical, but it does fundamentally shift incentives and transparency.
A Simple Analogy - Bread, Not Media
To make the difference relatable, picture this scenario.
You ask a friend to buy you a loaf of bread.
In the agent model:
They go to the shop, choose the best loaf based on what you asked for, bring it back, show you the receipt, and charge you exactly what it cost. They acted entirely in your interests.
In the principal model:
That same friend has already bought 500 loaves of a particular type of bread earlier in the week at a bulk price. When you ask for bread, they offer you one of the loaves they pre-bought. They set the price. They do not show you the receipt. And they are motivated to sell the bread they already have, whether or not it is the best bread for your needs.
The bread might be perfectly good.
But the decision is no longer purely about your preferences.
It is now shaped by what your friend needs to shift.
This is the essence of principal media.
How the industry got to this point
To understand why principal media has become widespread, it helps to look at how the advertising supply chain has changed.
Twenty years ago, the ecosystem was relatively simple. Today it includes:
With every new link in the chain comes another business that needs funding. And all of it ultimately comes from the advertiser’s budget.
At the same time:
agencies face constant pressure to keep fees low
procurement teams demand greater efficiency
agencies are expected to deliver more services at lower cost
pitches reward unrealistic rate promises
infrastructure costs continue to rise
Principal media evolved as a mechanism to keep agencies financially viable in a highly competitive market. It generates revenue not from hours worked, but from the margin on media itself.
It is, in other words, a business model solution to an industry-wide commercial challenge.
Why agencies use Principal Media
Agency groups rarely hide the fact that principal media is a significant revenue stream. It helps them:
1. Offset low or subsidised fees
Many pitches are won with fee levels that are below cost. Principal media is one way to make up the difference.
2. Create predictable profit
Reselling inventory produces a more reliable margin than time-based fees.
3. Build proprietary 'products'
These can be branded as premium placements, value bundles or exclusive deals and often include pre-bought inventory.
4. Maximise trading power
Buying in bulk gives agency's stronger negotiating leverage with media owners, enabling bigger discounts that can be resold at more attractive margins.
From a commercial perspective, principal media makes sense.
From a client perspective, it introduces risks that demand careful management.